Stafford v. State

129 So. 310, 23 Ala. App. 556, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 166
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 1930·No. 8 Div. 48, 49.·Published

Opinion

*557 RICE, J.

The court has read the testimony in this case, sitting en banc. It shows that these two appellants, with three others, all country boys, were on their way, at night, to a “party,” all riding in, or on, a one-seated Ford; that there was thrown out of the Ford a bottle of whisky; that when the Ford was stopped there was on the seat a bottle with a very^ small quantity of whisky in it; that one of these appellants was drunk, and some others in the car “smelled of whisky.” This was all.

All five occupants of the Ford were put on trial for “having whisky in their possession,” etc., three of them acquitted, and the two appellants convicted — we assume, on “general principles.”

We are of the opinion that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment of conviction.

It is accordingly reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stafford v. State, 129 So. 310, 23 Ala. App. 556, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 166 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

129 So. 310 (Stafford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.