Stafford v. Stafford

20 S.E.2d 217, 200 S.C. 1, 1942 S.C. LEXIS 59
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 12, 1942
Docket15410
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 S.E.2d 217 (Stafford v. Stafford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stafford v. Stafford, 20 S.E.2d 217, 200 S.C. 1, 1942 S.C. LEXIS 59 (S.C. 1942).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court ■ was delivered by

Mr. Associate Justice Stukes :

The circuit decree from which this appeal was taken is affirmed and adopted as the judgment of this Court. It will be reported. There are ample sustaining authorities; among ■them are: Cannon v. Cannon, 135 S. C., 183, 133 S. E., 556; and Kirkham v. First Nat. Bank, 149 S. C., 545, 147 S. E., 648.

The exceptions question (1) the sufficiency of the factual showing of reasonable necessity for, or the expediency of, the sale of the property; (2) that the sales price is the full value, and (3) the safeguarding of the fund for the life tenants and remaindermen.

However, careful consideration of the testimony and Master’s report discloses no reasonable foundation for the criticisms. It is noted that the provisions for the preservation and application of the substituted fund in accord with the terms of the deed are very similar to the requirements made by this Court in Cannon v. Cannon, supra.

The exceptions are overruled and the judgment affirmed.

Mr. Ci-iiEE Justice Bonham and Messrs. Associate Justices Baker and Fisitburne concur. Circuit Judge L. D. Fide, Acting Associate Justice, disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wingard v. Hennessee
33 S.E.2d 390 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 S.E.2d 217, 200 S.C. 1, 1942 S.C. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stafford-v-stafford-sc-1942.