Stafford v. Stafford

520 S.E.2d 785, 351 N.C. 94, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 1159
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 5, 1999·No. 245A99·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On 14 May 1996, plaintiff filed a complaint seeking an absolute divorce, and subsequently amended the complaint to include equitable distribution. On 3 March 1998, the absolute divorce action was severed from the remaining issues for hearing purposes with the parties’ consent. After granting plaintiff an absolute divorce from defendant, the trial court reserved the remaining issues in the cause for later hearing.

In the instant case, the parties were divorced on 23 April 1998. Neither appellate party contests the validity of the final divorce judgment from which the appeal is taken. However, both parties contend this Court should determine whether the findings of fact support the date of separation. Plaintiff contends, and the trial court found, that the date of separation is the first week of October 1992. In contrast, defendant contends the date of separation is 13 September 1991.

*95 A basis for granting an absolute divorce is that the parties must live separate and apart for one year. See N.C.G.S. § 50-6 (1995). Regardless of the date of separation, the parties have been separated for a period far in excess of one year. Therefore, the date of separation has no bearing in this case on the legality of the final divorce judgment. The contested fact concerning the date of separation is an issue in the equitable distribution claim, which can be raised in a later appeal, if any. Thus, this appeal is interlocutory and the decision of the Court of Appeals dismissing plaintiffs appeal is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stafford v. Stafford, 520 S.E.2d 785, 351 N.C. 94, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 1159 (N.C. 1999).

520 S.E.2d 785 (Stafford v. Stafford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheena v. Sheena
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2026
Honeycutt v. Honeycutt
701 S.E.2d 689 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Johnson v. Johnson
701 S.E.2d 722 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Duncan v. Duncan
671 S.E.2d 71 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
McIntyre v. McIntyre
623 S.E.2d 828 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.
598 S.E.2d 570 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Myers v. Mutton
574 S.E.2d 73 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
Creek Pointe Homeowner's Ass'n v. Happ
552 S.E.2d 220 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
Rong Teat Yang v. Three Springs, Inc.
542 S.E.2d 666 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
McCall v. McCall
531 S.E.2d 894 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)