Stafford v. Rogers
1 Hopk. Ch. 98
This text of 1 Hopk. Ch. 98 (Stafford v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stafford v. Rogers, 1 Hopk. Ch. 98 (N.Y. 1824).
Opinion
said that it would consider the point which remained undecided; and the next day it was decided, that by the practice of this court, the party taking exceptions, is not compelled to set them down for argument. As either party may .do it, there is no reason for the English practice, which in this particular, has never been adopted in this court.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Hopk. Ch. 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stafford-v-rogers-nychanct-1824.