Stafford v. Pearson

26 La. Ann. 658
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided July 15, 1874·No. No. 488·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Wyly, J.

The defendants appeal from the judgment against them [659] for $2085 45, with recognition of furnisher of supplies privilege ón their crops.

They assign as error oí law that of the account sued on, items amounting in the aggregate, to $378 98. were not necessary supplies; and therefore, the privilege to that extent should be reduced. The items objected to, consisting mainly of tobacco, pipes, whisky, cards, perfumery, etc., etc., are in no sense supplies necessary to make acrop. 23 An. 469. For such supplies the law allows no privilege.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment be amended by reducing the amount of the privilege three hundred and seventy eight dollars and ninety-eight, cents, and .as thus amended let'it be affirmed, appellee paying costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stafford v. Pearson, 26 La. Ann. 658 (La. 1874).

26 La. Ann. 658 (Stafford v. Pearson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dantoni v. Distefano
140 So. 67 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1932)
Broussard-Labry Inc. v. People's Bank & Trust Co.
5 La. App. 312 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)
Henry Lochte Co. v. Lefevre
54 So. 578 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1911)
Milliken v. Barrow
65 F. 888 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana, 1895)