Stafford v. John W. Cowper Co.

256 A.D. 894, 9 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5276
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 11, 1939·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The inquiry upon this motion is whether the first and second defenses alleged in the answer in truth present an issue to be tried. The affidavit submitted by the plaintiff in support of his motion to strike out these defenses as sham and as tending to prejudice a fair trial of the action, was properly received (Fleischer v. Terker, 259 N. Y. 60; Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., Inc., v. City of New York, 247 App. Div. 163), and being uncontradieted leads to an affirmance of the order. All concur. (The order grants plaintiff’s motion to strike out certain defenses in defendant’s amended answer in a negligence action.) • Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stafford v. John W. Cowper Co., 256 A.D. 894, 9 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

256 A.D. 894 (Stafford v. John W. Cowper Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Purdy v. McGarity
176 Misc. 82 (New York Supreme Court, 1941)