Stafford v. Hayes

327 So. 2d 871
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 1976
DocketZ-301
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 327 So. 2d 871 (Stafford v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stafford v. Hayes, 327 So. 2d 871 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

327 So.2d 871 (1976)

Don H. STAFFORD, Appellant,
v.
John HAYES and Tim Smith, Individually and As Employees of WKY Television System, Inc. d/b/a WTVT, Channel 13, Appellees.

No. Z-301.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 5, 1976.

Thomas F. Woods, of Woods & Johnston, Tallahassee, for appellant.

William F. McGowan, Jr., and Eurich Z. Griffin of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tampa, for appellees.

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant, a public relations representative concerned with his client's legislative interests, visited the Hilton Hotel's *872 bar in Tallahassee when the Capitol was evacuated after a bomb threat. He was there photographed by the appellee television crew who entered the bar with cameras and floodlights to examine and record the convivial alternative to work which had thus become available to State employees temporarily displaced from their desks. The lights hurt appellant's sensitive eyes and he was offended and embarrassed by his appearance on television that evening. The trial court correctly determined on motion for summary judgment that the injury to appellant's eyes was not foreseeable by the television crew as a substantially certain result of their camera lights and, consequently, that appellant's claim of assault and battery was unfounded. Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1972). The trial court also correctly determined that appellant was an actor in a newsworthy occurrence of public interest and that appellees were privileged to telecast pictures of the group which included appellant. Jacova v. Southern Radio and Tele. Co., 83 So.2d 34 (Fla. 1955).

Affirmed.

McCORD, Acting C.J., and FULLER, RICHARD S., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bosley v. WildWett. Com
310 F. Supp. 2d 914 (N.D. Ohio, 2004)
Heath v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc.
732 F. Supp. 1145 (S.D. Florida, 1990)
Sardinas v. M.C.A., Inc.
484 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Etcher v. Blitch
381 So. 2d 1119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Nelson v. Globe Communications Corp.
45 Fla. Supp. 48 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 So. 2d 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stafford-v-hayes-fladistctapp-1976.