Home/California Court of Appeal/Stafford Packing Company v. Fish and Game Commission

Stafford Packing Company v. Fish and Game Commission

243 P. 704, 75 Cal. App. 790, 1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 219
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 23, 1925
DocketDocket No. 5247.
StatusPublished

This text of 243 P. 704 (Stafford Packing Company v. Fish and Game Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stafford Packing Company v. Fish and Game Commission, 243 P. 704, 75 Cal. App. 790, 1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 219 (Cal. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

The pleadings, the facts, the relief sought by the petitioner, and the contentions of respective counsel in all essential particulars are identical with those set forth in the case ofVan Camp Sea Food Co., Inc., v. Fish and Game Commission,ante, p. 764 [243 P. 702]. [1] Relying upon that case as an authority, it is ordered that the demurrer to the petition be and it is sustained, and that the writ heretofore issued herein be and the same is discharged.

Conrey, P.J., and Curtis, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Camp Sea Food Co. v. Fish & Game Commission
243 P. 702 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 P. 704, 75 Cal. App. 790, 1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stafford-packing-company-v-fish-and-game-commission-calctapp-1925.