Staff v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
This text of 79 Ill. App. 295 (Staff v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Error to the Superior Court of Cook County.
This case was affirmed because the questions of fact were properly submitted to and determined by the jury and upon the authority of Theobald v. C., M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 75 Ill. App. 216, and Chicago City Bail way Co. v. Canevin, 72 Ill. App. 81. The court submitted special interrogatories to the jury of its own motion which tvere not submitted to counsel before argument. Ho exception was taken at the time. Held, the objection came too late upon motion for new trial. Sterling v. Grove, 56 Ill. App. 370; see also Harp v. Parr, 1.68 Ill. 459.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 Ill. App. 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staff-v-chicago-milwaukee-st-paul-railway-co-illappct-1898.