Staff v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

79 Ill. App. 295
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedDecember 23, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 79 Ill. App. 295 (Staff v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Staff v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co., 79 Ill. App. 295 (Ill. Ct. App. 1898).

Opinion

Error to the Superior Court of Cook County.

This case was affirmed because the questions of fact were properly submitted to and determined by the jury and upon the authority of Theobald v. C., M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 75 Ill. App. 216, and Chicago City Bail way Co. v. Canevin, 72 Ill. App. 81. The court submitted special interrogatories to the jury of its own motion which tvere not submitted to counsel before argument. Ho exception was taken at the time. Held, the objection came too late upon motion for new trial. Sterling v. Grove, 56 Ill. App. 370; see also Harp v. Parr, 1.68 Ill. 459.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Worthen v. Thomson
98 N.E.2d 142 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 Ill. App. 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staff-v-chicago-milwaukee-st-paul-railway-co-illappct-1898.