Staff Management Systems v. Wilkes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Staff Management Systems v. Wilkes

659 So. 2d 324, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12875, 1994 WL 716796

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 29, 1994

DocketNo. 93-1960

StatusPublished

This text of 659 So. 2d 324 (Staff Management Systems v. Wilkes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Staff Management Systems v. Wilkes, 659 So. 2d 324, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12875, 1994 WL 716796 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on our review of the record, we find the order of the judge of compensation claims (“JCC”) supported by competent substantial evidence and affirm except in one respect. Employer/Carrier challenge the award of medical benefits contending the JCC erred in failing to make a finding, consistent with section 440.13(2)(d), Florida Statutes, as to whether the medical benefits awarded were reasonable and necessary. We agree that such a finding is required in this case. See Tropicana Products v. Gunther, 643 So.2d 698 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); University of Florida v. Vice, 601 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Polk County Board of Commissioners v. Varnado, 576 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Therefore we reverse on this issue and remand for a finding as to the reasonableness and necessity of the medical benefits awarded.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further findings consistent with this opinion. ,

ERVIN, JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based on our review of the record, we find the order of the judge of compensation claims (“JCC”) supported by competent substantial evidence and affirm except in one respect. Employer/Carrier challenge the award of medical benefits contending the JCC erred in failing to make a finding, consistent with section 440.13(2)(d), Florida Statutes, as to whether the medical benefits awarded were reasonable and necessary. We agree that such a finding is required in this case. See Tropicana Products v. Gunther, 643 So.2d 698 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); University of Florida v. Vice, 601 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Polk County Board of Commissioners v. Varnado, 576 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Therefore we reverse on this issue and remand for a finding as to the reasonableness and necessity of the medical benefits awarded.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further findings consistent with this opinion. ,

ERVIN, JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

659 So. 2d 324, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12875, 1994 WL 716796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staff-management-systems-v-wilkes-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack