Stacy Orlando Parham v. Willie Challis Frank Bega

Fourth Circuit

Stacy Orlando Parham v. Willie Challis Frank Bega

72 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39572, 1995 WL 739388

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 14, 1995

Docket95-6709

StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.3d 127 (Stacy Orlando Parham v. Willie Challis Frank Bega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stacy Orlando Parham v. Willie Challis Frank Bega, 72 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39572, 1995 WL 739388 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

72 F.3d 127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Stacy Orlando PARHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Willie CHALLIS; Frank Bega, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6709.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 21, 1995.
Decided Dec. 14, 1995.

Stacy Orlando Parham, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh McCoy Fain, III, SPOTTS, SMITH, FAIN & RAWLS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The parties consented to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Parham v. Challis, No. CA-94-371 (E.D.Va. Apr. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

72 F.3d 127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Stacy Orlando PARHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Willie CHALLIS; Frank Bega, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6709.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 21, 1995.
Decided Dec. 14, 1995.

Stacy Orlando Parham, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh McCoy Fain, III, SPOTTS, SMITH, FAIN & RAWLS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The parties consented to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Parham v. Challis, No. CA-94-371 (E.D.Va. Apr. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39572, 1995 WL 739388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stacy-orlando-parham-v-willie-challis-frank-bega-ca4-1995.