Stacy L. Erwin Oakes v. Saginaw County Circuit Cour

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 29, 2021·No. 162958·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

July 29, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

162958 & (4)(5)(6)(12)(13)(15)(17)(18) Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh

STACY L. ERWIN OAKES, Elizabeth M. Welch, Plaintiff, Justices

v SC: 162958 SAGINAW COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT and SAGINAW COUNTY CLERK, Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to supplement brief is GRANTED. The motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. On its own motion, the Court has determined that the plaintiff has “habitually, persistently, and without reasonable cause engage[d] in vexatious conduct,” MCR 7.316(C)(3), so the plaintiff is prohibited from filing actions in this Court without the filing fee. The ex parte motion for consideration of complaint, the motion requesting issuance of TRO, the motion to withdraw pleadings, and the motion for courtroom assignment are DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2021

b0726 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stacy L. Erwin Oakes v. Saginaw County Circuit Cour, (Mich. 2021).

Stacy L. Erwin Oakes v. Saginaw County Circuit Cour (Stacy L. Erwin Oakes v. Saginaw County Circuit Cour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.