Stacks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stacks v. State

275 So. 3d 1257

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 23, 2019

DocketNo. 1D18-3062

StatusPublished

This text of 275 So. 3d 1257 (Stacks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stacks v. State, 275 So. 3d 1257 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Following a jury trial Appellant was convicted of first degree murder and attempted first degree murder. He was sentenced to life in prison for the murder and a consecutive 75 year sentence for the attempted murder. We affirmed his convictions and sentences on direct appeal in Stacks v. State , 177 So. 3d 255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Appellant now challenges the trial court's denial of postconviction relief on the sixteen grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel alleged in Appellant's amended motion under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The State responded to five of the claims, as directed by the trial court. The trial court's detailed order and attachments, including the established law the court relied upon, conclusively demonstrated that Appellant is not entitled to relief on any of the grounds alleged. Therefore, the trial court's order is AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Following a jury trial Appellant was convicted of first degree murder and attempted first degree murder. He was sentenced to life in prison for the murder and a consecutive 75 year sentence for the attempted murder. We affirmed his convictions and sentences on direct appeal in Stacks v. State , 177 So. 3d 255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Appellant now challenges the trial court's denial of postconviction relief on the sixteen grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel alleged in Appellant's amended motion under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The State responded to five of the claims, as directed by the trial court. The trial court's detailed order and attachments, including the established law the court relied upon, conclusively demonstrated that Appellant is not entitled to relief on any of the grounds alleged. Therefore, the trial court's order is AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 So. 3d 1257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stacks-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.