Stack v. Weatherwax
5 N.Y.S. 510, 1 Silv. Sup. 548, 24 N.Y. St. Rep. 90, 52 Hun 615, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2488
Opinion
There was no sufficient evidence of duress to go to the jury. The defense of want of consideration was not sustained. Contemporarily with the execution of the note, the plaintiff executed, acknowledged, and left for the defendant a satisfaction piece of the judgment recovered by the plaintiff against Van Loon. Whether Van Loon was solvent or not at that time, this was a consideration, if the parties so agreed, for the defendant’s note. Judgment affirmed, with costs
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stack v. Weatherwax, 5 N.Y.S. 510, 1 Silv. Sup. 548, 24 N.Y. St. Rep. 90, 52 Hun 615, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2488 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).
5 N.Y.S. 510 (Stack v. Weatherwax) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Partyka v. Zawadzki
131 Misc. 854 (New York Supreme Court, 1928)