Stack v. Weatherwax

5 N.Y.S. 510, 1 Silv. Sup. 548, 24 N.Y. St. Rep. 90, 52 Hun 615, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2488
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 27, 1889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There was no sufficient evidence of duress to go to the jury. The defense of want of consideration was not sustained. Contemporarily with the execution of the note, the plaintiff executed, acknowledged, and left for the defendant a satisfaction piece of the judgment recovered by the plaintiff against Van Loon. Whether Van Loon was solvent or not at that time, this was a consideration, if the parties so agreed, for the defendant’s note. Judgment affirmed, with costs

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stack v. Weatherwax, 5 N.Y.S. 510, 1 Silv. Sup. 548, 24 N.Y. St. Rep. 90, 52 Hun 615, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2488 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

5 N.Y.S. 510 (Stack v. Weatherwax) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Partyka v. Zawadzki
131 Misc. 854 (New York Supreme Court, 1928)