Stack v. Outstanding Marine

558 F. App'x 316
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 4, 2014
DocketNo. 13-2471
StatusPublished

This text of 558 F. App'x 316 (Stack v. Outstanding Marine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stack v. Outstanding Marine, 558 F. App'x 316 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Francis Stack, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaints and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stack v. Outstanding Marine, No. 1:13-cv-01835-WMN (D.Md. Nov. 7, 2013). We deny Stack’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[317]*317fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
558 F. App'x 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stack-v-outstanding-marine-ca4-2014.