Stack v. Outstanding Marine

Fourth Circuit

Stack v. Outstanding Marine

558 F. App'x 316

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2014·No. No. 13-2471·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Francis Stack, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaints and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stack v. Outstanding Marine, No. 1:13-cv-01835-WMN (D.Md. Nov. 7, 2013). We deny Stack’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[317] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Francis Stack, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaints and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stack v. Outstanding Marine, No. 1:13-cv-01835-WMN (D.Md. Nov. 7, 2013). We deny Stack’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[317] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Stack v. Outstanding Marine, 558 F. App'x 316 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

558 F. App'x 316 (Stack v. Outstanding Marine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.