Stacie Ann Shakir v. Providence at Memorial Apartments LLC

• Court: Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
• Decided: February 10, 2026
• Docket: 01-25-00295-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Opinion issued February 10, 2026

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00295-CV ——————————— STACIE ANN SHAKIR, Appellant V. PROVIDENCE AT MEMORIAL APARTMENTS LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1230917

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 12, 2025, the Court struck appellant’s brief because it failed to

comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1 and outlined specific

deficiencies for correction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. On September 29, 2025,

appellant filed an amended brief. Although appellant corrected some deficiencies noted in the court’s August 12, 2025 order, the brief did not correct other deficiencies

specified in our order. Thus, the Court struck the amended brief and issued another

order on October 2, 2025, listing the deficiencies in the amended brief and ordered

appellant to file a brief correcting the listed deficiencies by October 17, 2025. The

Court stated in the October 2, 2025 order that if appellant failed to file a second

amended brief correcting the listed deficiencies, the Court might dismiss the appeal

without further notice.

On October 6, 2025, appellant filed a motion to accept the brief that had been

stricken and a motion for summary judgment in favor of appellant. We deny the

motions.

Because appellant has not complied with our order of October 2, 2025, the

Court dismisses the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3, 43.2(f). Any other pending

motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Dokupil.