Stacie Ann Shakir v. Jannu Investments LLC

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 29, 2024
• Docket: 01-24-00468-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Opinion issued August 29, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00468-CV ——————————— STACIE ANN SHAKIR, Appellant V. JANNU INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 24-CCV-074808

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 17, 2024, appellant Stacie Ann Shakir filed a notice of appeal from

the underlying trial court proceedings. Appellant has neither paid the required fees

nor established indigence for purposes of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R.

APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts

of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket

No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On July 12, 2024, appellant was notified that

this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellate costs were not paid, or indigence

was not established, by August 12, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant

did not adequately respond.

Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the

preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On June 25, 2024,

appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellant did not

submit written evidence that she had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for

the preparation of the clerk’s record by July 25, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),

(c). Appellant did not adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and

want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Guerra, and Farris.