Stachowski v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
This text of 190 A.D.2d 1004 (Stachowski v. Consolidated Rail Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint [1005]*1005dismissed. Memorandum: In this action pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, plaintiffs claim for noise-induced occupational hearing loss accrued in May of 1986 when plaintiffs hearing problem first manifested itself and he suspected that his employment was a cause (see, United States v Kubrick, 444 US 111, 120-123; Urie v Thompson, 337 US 163, 169-170; Fries v Chicago & Northwestern Transp. Co., 909 F2d 1092, 1095; Lechowicz v Consolidated Rail Corp., 190 AD2d 998 [decided herewith]; cf., Guiher v South Buffalo Ry. Co., 190 AD2d 997 [decided herewith]). Because this action was commenced more than three years from the date of accrual (see, 45 USC § 56), Supreme Court erred in failing to dismiss plaintiffs complaint as time-barred. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Boehm, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 A.D.2d 1004, 594 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stachowski-v-consolidated-rail-corp-nyappdiv-1993.