Stachl v. Salazzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stachl v. Salazzo

232 A.D. 707

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 232 A.D. 707 (Stachl v. Salazzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stachl v. Salazzo, 232 A.D. 707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff for specific performance, with costs. In our' opinion, plaintiff’s Exhibit 1 contains the essential terms of a valid agreement, and is a good and enforcible contract for the sale of the real property described therein. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and appropriate findings and conclusions will be made. Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff for specific performance, with costs. In our' opinion, plaintiff’s Exhibit 1 contains the essential terms of a valid agreement, and is a good and enforcible contract for the sale of the real property described therein. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and appropriate findings and conclusions will be made. Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D. 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stachl-v-salazzo-nyappdiv-1931.