Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Stachelczyk v. McIvor

Stachelczyk v. McIvor

177 A.D.2d 1064, 587 N.Y.S.2d 865
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1991
StatusPublished

This text of 177 A.D.2d 1064 (Stachelczyk v. McIvor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stachelczyk v. McIvor, 177 A.D.2d 1064, 587 N.Y.S.2d 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Motion for extension of time to file respondent’s brief denied. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to serve and file a responding brief is denied as unnecessary. Defendant has not filed a demand for respondent’s brief (see, 22 NYCRR 1000.7). Present—Boomer, J. P., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ. (Order entered Nov. 6, 1991.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 A.D.2d 1064, 587 N.Y.S.2d 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stachelczyk-v-mcivor-nyappdiv-1991.