Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Stacey v. State

Stacey v. State

83 So. 3d 749, 2011 WL 2650875, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10649
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 8, 2011
Docket5D10-678
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 83 So. 3d 749 (Stacey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stacey v. State, 83 So. 3d 749, 2011 WL 2650875, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10649 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences for conspiracy to traffic in 200 grams or more of methamphetamine; trafficking in 200 grams or more of methamphetamine; possession of listed chemical; and tampering with physical evidence. On each of these counts the circumstantial proof was sufficient to support the jury verdict. Based upon double jeopardy grounds, we vacate the conviction and sentence for manufacture of methamphetamine. Ford v. State, 749 So.2d 570 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART.

GRIFFIN, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perez-Riva v. State
152 So. 3d 98 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Odom v. State
104 So. 3d 1238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Fonseca v. State
114 So. 3d 1010 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 So. 3d 749, 2011 WL 2650875, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stacey-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.