Stacey v. State

984 So. 2d 675, 2008 WL 2543543
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 27, 2008
Docket5D08-308
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 984 So. 2d 675 (Stacey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stacey v. State, 984 So. 2d 675, 2008 WL 2543543 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

984 So.2d 675 (2008)

Ronnie Eugene STACEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D08-308.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 27, 2008.

Ronnie Eugene Stacey, Blountstown, Pro Se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey R. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273, 275 (Fla.1992) (holding that in case of multiple violations of probation, sentences may be bumped one cell or guideline range for each violation).

PALMER, C.J., GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wescar Management, Inc. v. Strubakis
984 So. 2d 675 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
984 So. 2d 675, 2008 WL 2543543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stacey-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.