Stacey v. Robbin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Stacey v. Robbin

194 Ill. App. 349, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 500

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided June 17, 1915·No. Gen. No. 19,672·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Pam delivered

the opinion of the court.

5. Intoxicating liquors, § 202*—when declaration sufficient in action under civil damage act against property owner. A declaration in an action under section 9 of the Dramshop Act (J. & A. If 4609) by a wife and" children against the keepers of saloons and the owners of the property where the business was conducted, to recover for injuries sustained from the sale of intoxicating liquor to a husband and father, does not state a cause of action against the property owners where it does not allege that liquor was sold or given the husband in the property or buildings owned by either of the other defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Pam delivered

the opinion of the court.

5. Intoxicating liquors, § 202*—when declaration sufficient in action under civil damage act against property owner. A declaration in an action under section 9 of the Dramshop Act (J. & A. If 4609) by a wife and" children against the keepers of saloons and the owners of the property where the business was conducted, to recover for injuries sustained from the sale of intoxicating liquor to a husband and father, does not state a cause of action against the property owners where it does not allege that liquor was sold or given the husband in the property or buildings owned by either of the other defendants.

Stacey v. Robbin, 194 Ill. App. 349, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 500 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

194 Ill. App. 349 (Stacey v. Robbin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related