Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/Stacey v. Robbin

Stacey v. Robbin

194 Ill. App. 349, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 500
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJune 17, 1915
DocketGen. No. 19,672
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 194 Ill. App. 349 (Stacey v. Robbin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stacey v. Robbin, 194 Ill. App. 349, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 500 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Pam delivered

the opinion of the court.

5. Intoxicating liquors, § 202*—when declaration sufficient in action under civil damage act against property owner. A declaration in an action under section 9 of the Dramshop Act (J. & A. If 4609) by a wife and" children against the keepers of saloons and the owners of the property where the business was conducted, to recover for injuries sustained from the sale of intoxicating liquor to a husband and father, does not state a cause of action against the property owners where it does not allege that liquor was sold or given the husband in the property or buildings owned by either of the other defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spousta v. Berger
231 Ill. App. 454 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 Ill. App. 349, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stacey-v-robbin-illappct-1915.