Stacey Sprung v. Matthew Cowan and Steve McCampbell
This text of Stacey Sprung v. Matthew Cowan and Steve McCampbell (Stacey Sprung v. Matthew Cowan and Steve McCampbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-26-00123-CV __________________
STACEY SPRUNG, Appellant
V.
MATTHEW COWAN AND STEVE MCCAMPBELL, Appellees
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 457th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19-06-08731 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Stacey Sprung, Appellant, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Appellant filed the motion before the appellate court issued a
decision in the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on April 15, 2026 Opinion Delivered April 16, 2026 Before Golemon, C.J., Wright and Chambers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stacey Sprung v. Matthew Cowan and Steve McCampbell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stacey-sprung-v-matthew-cowan-and-steve-mccampbell-txctapp9-2026.