Stacey Renae Hammer v. Lea C. Noelke, Judith E. Bryant, and Noelke, English, Maples, St. Leger, Blair, LLP
This text of Stacey Renae Hammer v. Lea C. Noelke, Judith E. Bryant, and Noelke, English, Maples, St. Leger, Blair, LLP (Stacey Renae Hammer v. Lea C. Noelke, Judith E. Bryant, and Noelke, English, Maples, St. Leger, Blair, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13-17-00223-CV
Stacey Renae Hammer v. Lea C. Noelke, Judith E. Bryant, and Noelke, English, Maples, St. Leger, Blair, LLP
On appeal from the 250th District Court of Travis County, Texas Trial Cause No. D-1-GN-14-002177
JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed
in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the
judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the
case is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with its opinion.
Costs of the appeal are adjudged fifty percent against appellant and fifty percent against
appellees.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
November 29, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stacey Renae Hammer v. Lea C. Noelke, Judith E. Bryant, and Noelke, English, Maples, St. Leger, Blair, LLP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stacey-renae-hammer-v-lea-c-noelke-judith-e-bryant-and-noelke-texapp-2018.