Stacey Renae Hammer v. Lea C. Noelke, Judith E. Bryant, and Noelke, English, Maples, St. Leger, Blair, LLP

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 29, 2018·No. 13-17-00223-CV·Published

Opinion

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00223-CV

Stacey Renae Hammer v. Lea C. Noelke, Judith E. Bryant, and Noelke, English, Maples, St. Leger, Blair, LLP

On appeal from the 250th District Court of Travis County, Texas Trial Cause No. D-1-GN-14-002177

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed

in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the

case is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with its opinion.

Costs of the appeal are adjudged fifty percent against appellant and fifty percent against

appellees.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 29, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stacey Renae Hammer v. Lea C. Noelke, Judith E. Bryant, and Noelke, English, Maples, St. Leger, Blair, LLP, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Stacey Renae Hammer v. Lea C. Noelke, Judith E. Bryant, and Noelke, English, Maples, St. Leger, Blair, LLP (Stacey Renae Hammer v. Lea C. Noelke, Judith E. Bryant, and Noelke, English, Maples, St. Leger, Blair, LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.