Stacey R. Hammer v. Richard Hammer
This text of Stacey R. Hammer v. Richard Hammer (Stacey R. Hammer v. Richard Hammer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-18-00715-CV
Stacey R. Hammer, Appellant
v.
Richard Hammer, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-FM-17-005035, HONORABLE SCOTT H. JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Stacey R. Hammer has filed an unopposed motion to abate this appeal
pending the trial court’s rulings on motions that are pending in the underlying proceeding. Appellant
represents that her appeal is from an ex parte order appointing a receiver; that the pending motions
are scheduled to be heard by the trial court on February 6, 2019; and that the trial court’s rulings on
the pending motions may moot or significantly change the issues on appeal. Accordingly, we grant
the unopposed motion and abate this appeal. All appellate deadlines will be tolled during the period
of abatement.
Absent further order of this Court, this appeal will be automatically reinstated forty-
five days from the date of this order. The parties are directed to file either a status report or a motion
to dismiss by that date. Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana
Abated
Filed: January 24, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stacey R. Hammer v. Richard Hammer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stacey-r-hammer-v-richard-hammer-texapp-2019.