Stacey Hartwig v. Neurological Fitness and Recovery Facilities II, LLC D/B/A Neufit; Neurological Fitness Equipment and Education, LLC; Garrett Salpeter, and Tayler Thatcher

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 18, 2025·No. 15-25-00190-CV·Published

Opinion

Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 18, 2025.

In The

Fifteenth Court of Appeals NO. 15-25-00190-CV

STACEY HARTWIG, Appellant V.

NEUROLOGICAL FITNESS AND RECOVERY FACILITIES II, LLC D/B/A NEUFIT; NEUROLOGICAL FITNESS EQUIPMENT AND EDUCATION, LLC; GARRETT SALPETER, AND TAYLER THATCHER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 345th District Court Travis County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GN-25-008222

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, explaining that the parties have settled their dispute. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Field and Farris.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stacey Hartwig v. Neurological Fitness and Recovery Facilities II, LLC D/B/A Neufit; Neurological Fitness Equipment and Education, LLC; Garrett Salpeter, and Tayler Thatcher, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Stacey Hartwig v. Neurological Fitness and Recovery Facilities II, LLC D/B/A Neufit; Neurological Fitness Equipment and Education, LLC; Garrett Salpeter, and Tayler Thatcher (Stacey Hartwig v. Neurological Fitness and Recovery Facilities II, LLC D/B/A Neufit; Neurological Fitness Equipment and Education, LLC; Garrett Salpeter, and Tayler Thatcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.