Stacey H. v. Range Resources

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 17, 2018·No. 97 WM 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

STACEY HANEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND : No. 97 WM 2017 AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN : OF HARLEY HANEY, A MINOR, AND : PAIGE HANEY, A MINOR, AND BETH : VOYLES, AND JOHN VOYLES, : HUSBAND AND WIFE, ASHLEY : VOYLES, INDIVIDUALLY, LOREN : KISKADDEN, INDIVIDUALLY, GRACE : KISKADDEN, INDIVIDUALLY, :

:

Petitioners :

: :

v. :

: :

RANGE RESOURCES-APPALACHIA, : LLC, AND TESTAMERICA : LABORATORIES, INC., ET AL., :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2018, the Application for the Exercise of

King’s Bench Power or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stacey H. v. Range Resources, (Pa. 2018).

Stacey H. v. Range Resources (Stacey H. v. Range Resources) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.