Stacey E. Frerichs v. Arthur Mattson
This text of Stacey E. Frerichs v. Arthur Mattson (Stacey E. Frerichs v. Arthur Mattson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 24, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-1848 Lower Tribunal No. 22-CA-177-M ________________
Stacey E. Frerichs, et al., Appellants,
vs.
Arthur Mattson, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Mark H. Jones, Judge.
Older, Lundy, Koch & Martino, and Jon Johnson (Tampa), for appellants.
Harvey J. Sepler, P.A., and Harvey J. Sepler (Hollywood); Campbell & Malafy, and Richard A. Malafy (Marathon), for appellees.
Before LINDSEY, BOKOR and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortg. Co. v. Wright, 253 So.
3d 72, 73 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (“The trial court’s factual findings are reviewed
under a competent, substantial evidence standard.”); Heineman v. State,
327 So. 2d 898, 898–99 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (“Knowledge is an elusive
quality. Like intent, since it is a state of mind, it is often not subject to direct
proof and can only be inferred from the circumstances of the case by the trier
of fact.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stacey E. Frerichs v. Arthur Mattson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stacey-e-frerichs-v-arthur-mattson-fladistctapp-2025.