Stacer v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.

117 S.E. 830, 30 Ga. App. 260, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 380
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1923
Docket14326,14327
StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 830 (Stacer v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stacer v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 117 S.E. 830, 30 Ga. App. 260, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 380 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The verdict in favor of the defendant was amply authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment below refusing to grant a new trial.

2. In view of the above ruling it is unnecessary to consider the. cross-bill of exceptions.

Judgment on maim bill of exceptions affirmed; cross-bill dismissed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Oliver & Oliver, J. T. Chapman, A. S. Anderson, for plaintiff. James A. Dixon, Charles G. Reynolds, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.E. 830, 30 Ga. App. 260, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stacer-v-central-of-georgia-railway-co-gactapp-1923.