Stabler v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Stabler v. State

90 So. 3d 267, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 342, 2012 WL 1623000, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 932

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 2012

DocketNo. SC08-2006

StatusPublished

This text of 90 So. 3d 267 (Stabler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stabler v. State, 90 So. 3d 267, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 342, 2012 WL 1623000, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 932 (Fla. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Stabler v. State, 990 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified [268]*268conflict with the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in State v. Rabb, 920 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We stayed proceedings in this case pending our disposition of Jardines v. State, 73 So.3d 34 (Fla.2011), cert. granted in part, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 995, 181 L.Ed.2d 726 (2012), in which we ultimately approved the result in the Fourth District’s Rabb decision. We then issued an order directing respondent in the present case to show cause why we should not accept jurisdiction, quash the First District’s Stabler decision, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Jardines.

Upon consideration of the response and petitioner’s reply thereto, we have determined to exercise jurisdiction and grant the petition for review in the present case. The decision under review is quashed and this matter is remanded to the First District for reconsideration upon application of this Court’s Jardines decision.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE and POLSTON, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Stabler v. State, 990 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified [268]*268conflict with the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in State v. Rabb, 920 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We stayed proceedings in this case pending our disposition of Jardines v. State, 73 So.3d 34 (Fla.2011), cert. granted in part, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 995, 181 L.Ed.2d 726 (2012), in which we ultimately approved the result in the Fourth District’s Rabb decision. We then issued an order directing respondent in the present case to show cause why we should not accept jurisdiction, quash the First District’s Stabler decision, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Jardines.

Upon consideration of the response and petitioner’s reply thereto, we have determined to exercise jurisdiction and grant the petition for review in the present case. The decision under review is quashed and this matter is remanded to the First District for reconsideration upon application of this Court’s Jardines decision.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE and POLSTON, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 So. 3d 267, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 342, 2012 WL 1623000, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stabler-v-state-fla-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack