Stabinski v. Clemdor Enterprises, Inc.
574 So. 2d 1134, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 559, 1991 WL 7711
Opinion
The trial court’s construction of the parties’ agreement as to each of the two particulars involved in this case is supported by the record. We are therefore bound to affirm the judgment below. Clark v. Clark, 79 So.2d 426 (Fla.1955); Hodder v. Hodder, 414 So.2d 9 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Pershing Industs., Inc. v. Shupnick, 325 So.2d 410 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 330 So.2d 21 (Fla.1976); Rylander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 302 So.2d 478 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stabinski v. Clemdor Enterprises, Inc., 574 So. 2d 1134, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 559, 1991 WL 7711 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
574 So. 2d 1134 (Stabinski v. Clemdor Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pershing Industries, Inc. v. Shupnick
325 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Clark v. Clark
79 So. 2d 426 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
Rylander v. Sears Roebuck & Company
302 So. 2d 478 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Hodder v. Hodder
414 So. 2d 9 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)