Stabiner v. Daniele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stabiner v. Daniele

10 A.D.2d 993, 204 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9739

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 993 (Stabiner v. Daniele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stabiner v. Daniele, 10 A.D.2d 993, 204 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for judgment declaring the existence of a prescriptive easement of access over land which intervenes between a driveway common to owners of a row of attached dwellings with rear garages and a street, and for removal of the obstruction of such passageway, the defendants appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 25, 1958, after trial before a Special Referee, as declares that plaintiffs have acquired such easement, as directs defendants to remove a fence, as enjoins defendants from interfering with the use of such easement, and as directs the Register of the City of New York to record the judgment. Judgment insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for judgment declaring the existence of a prescriptive easement of access over land which intervenes between a driveway common to owners of a row of attached dwellings with rear garages and a street, and for removal of the obstruction of such passageway, the defendants appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 25, 1958, after trial before a Special Referee, as declares that plaintiffs have acquired such easement, as directs defendants to remove a fence, as enjoins defendants from interfering with the use of such easement, and as directs the Register of the City of New York to record the judgment. Judgment insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 993, 204 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stabiner-v-daniele-nyappdiv-1960.