Stabile v. State

860 So. 2d 1057, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18391, 2003 WL 22867647
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stabile v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 790 So. 2d 1235
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 5, 2003·No. No. 5D02-3901·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the lower court’s order denying his motion for post-conviction relief made pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the order without comment on all issues except one — whether the trial court erred in summarily denying ground three of Appellant’s motion. On this issue, we reverse and remand with instructions that a hearing be conducted or that the trial court attach to any summary order denying relief those portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim. Oliver v. State, 691 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

[1058]*1058AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stabile v. State, 860 So. 2d 1057, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18391, 2003 WL 22867647 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

860 So. 2d 1057 (Stabile v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oliver v. State
691 So. 2d 1126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)