Staber Unemployment Compensation Case
This text of 146 A.2d 742 (Staber Unemployment Compensation Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
Alexander Staber was discharged by his employer, the General Electric Company, in Erie, and was denied unemployment compensation by the bureau, referee and board on the ground that his unemployment was the result of willful misconduct connected with his work. See Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law of 1936, as amended, 43 PS §802-(e).
The board found that the claimant was discharged ■because he was identified as a Communist and a member of the Steel Commission and the Electrical Commission of the Communist Party.
The evidence taken in this case by the compensation authorities was meager. We cannot determine from the record before us whether this appeal is governed ■by our decision in the Ault Unemployment Compensation Case, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 260, 146 A. 2d 729. We are, therefore, of the opinion that we should follow the procedure that we followed in the Panzino and Fitzpatrick Unemployment Compensation cases and remand [287]*287this case to the board for the taking of additional testimony, and for further consideration in the light of what was said in the above eases.
The case is remanded to the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review with instructions to proceed in a manner not inconsistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 A.2d 742, 188 Pa. Super. 285, 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staber-unemployment-compensation-case-pasuperct-1958.