Staats Mfg. Co. v. Fuller

Seventh Circuit

Staats Mfg. Co. v. Fuller

141 F.2d 689, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3771

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedApril 7, 1944

DocketNo. 8457

StatusPublished

This text of 141 F.2d 689 (Staats Mfg. Co. v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Staats Mfg. Co. v. Fuller, 141 F.2d 689, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3771 (7th Cir. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered May 26, 1943, in a proceeding wherein appellee sought and was awarded compensation for services and salary as an official of the Staats Manufacturing Company. The claim was prosecuted against the latter company while it was in receivership. The claim was referred to a Special Master who, after hearing testimony, made a report which contained findings of fact which supported appellee’s claim. Upon exceptions to such report, a hearing was had by the court and such findings approved.

At the hearing before this court, no counsel appeared for appellant, and oral argument was waived by counsel for appellee. We have examined the record and briefs sufficiently to ascertain that there is nothing involved other than matters of fact which have been found favorable to appellee. We are of the view that such findings are amply supported by the record. Under such circumstances, no good purpose could be served in relating or discussing such facts.

The judgment of the court below therefore is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered May 26, 1943, in a proceeding wherein appellee sought and was awarded compensation for services and salary as an official of the Staats Manufacturing Company. The claim was prosecuted against the latter company while it was in receivership. The claim was referred to a Special Master who, after hearing testimony, made a report which contained findings of fact which supported appellee’s claim. Upon exceptions to such report, a hearing was had by the court and such findings approved.

At the hearing before this court, no counsel appeared for appellant, and oral argument was waived by counsel for appellee. We have examined the record and briefs sufficiently to ascertain that there is nothing involved other than matters of fact which have been found favorable to appellee. We are of the view that such findings are amply supported by the record. Under such circumstances, no good purpose could be served in relating or discussing such facts.

The judgment of the court below therefore is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 F.2d 689, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staats-mfg-co-v-fuller-ca7-1944.