St. Vincent's Medical Center of Richmond v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

St. Vincent's Medical Center of Richmond v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

59 A.D.2d 778, 398 N.Y.S.2d 735, 18 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8715, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13833, 18 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1423

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 778 (St. Vincent's Medical Center of Richmond v. State Human Rights Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Vincent's Medical Center of Richmond v. State Human Rights Appeal Board, 59 A.D.2d 778, 398 N.Y.S.2d 735, 18 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8715, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13833, 18 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1423 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated December 29, 1975, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated May 2, 1975, which found, inter alia, that the petitioner had discriminated against the complainants on the basis of their sex with respect to the terms, conditions and privileges of employment. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The disallowance of pregnancy-related disabilities violated section 296 (subd 1, par [a]) of the Human Rights Law (Executive Law, art 15) (see Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 41 NY2d 84). We have considered the petitioner’s other arguments and have found them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated December 29, 1975, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated May 2, 1975, which found, inter alia, that the petitioner had discriminated against the complainants on the basis of their sex with respect to the terms, conditions and privileges of employment. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The disallowance of pregnancy-related disabilities violated section 296 (subd 1, par [a]) of the Human Rights Law (Executive Law, art 15) (see Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 41 NY2d 84). We have considered the petitioner’s other arguments and have found them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 778, 398 N.Y.S.2d 735, 18 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8715, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13833, 18 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-vincents-medical-center-of-richmond-v-state-human-rights-appeal-board-nyappdiv-1977.