St. Regis Paper Company, a New York Corporation v. Timber Traders, Inc., a Washington Corporation
This text of 451 F.2d 1025 (St. Regis Paper Company, a New York Corporation v. Timber Traders, Inc., a Washington Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this diversity case the only substantial question presented is whether the trial judge’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous. Rule 52(a) F.R.Civ.P. The trial judge found against defendant’s claims that the parties had orally agreed to modify a contract between them, or alternatively, that the plaintiff is estopped to deny that the contract was modified. Our examination of the record convinces us that the findings are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
451 F.2d 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-regis-paper-company-a-new-york-corporation-v-timber-traders-inc-a-ca9-1971.