St. Regis Paper Co. v. Bemis Co.

549 F.2d 833
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided February 3, 1977·No. No. 76-1044·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.

The outcome of this appeal turns on the validity of United States patent 3,650,460 and reissue patents 28,317 and 28,318. All three patents claim the invention of specialized bags which prevent leaking and sifting [834] better than previously existing bags. We do not find the bags to be nonobvious within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103, and therefore reverse the judgment of the district court which held the patents valid.

I

The subject of patent 3,650,460 (hereinafter the “Lokey” patent) is best described by reference to Figure 1.

It is a bag of tubular form consisting of several contiguous layers of flexible sheet material, such as paper. The bag is creased to provide a bellows effect so that it will lie flat until filled. Each of the panels formed by the crease is called a “gusset.” The rear surface of the bag is longer at the top than the front surface, allowing the rear surface to be folded over and glued to the front surface, thereby closing the top of the bag. [835] The bag is closed at the bottom in the same manner,

Footnotes

St. Regis Paper Co. v. Bemis Co., 549 F.2d 833 (7th Cir. 1977).

549 F.2d 833 (St. Regis Paper Co. v. Bemis Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
W.D. Louisiana, 2026
Thomas v. Cooley
W.D. Louisiana, 2024
Brunswick Corporation v. Champion Spark Plug Company
689 F.2d 740 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
Kalman v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
561 F. Supp. 628 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1982)
Marcyan v. Nissen Corp.
578 F. Supp. 485 (N.D. Indiana, 1982)
Medical Laboratory Automation, Inc. v. Labcon, Inc.
500 F. Supp. 54 (N.D. Illinois, 1980)
Republic Industries, Inc. v. Schlage Lock Company
592 F.2d 963 (Seventh Circuit, 1979)
Reynolds Metals Co. v. Aluminum Co. of America
457 F. Supp. 482 (N.D. Indiana, 1978)
St. Regis Paper Company v. Bemis Company, Inc.
549 F.2d 833 (Seventh Circuit, 1977)