St. Pierre v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.

592 So. 2d 1252, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 775, 1992 WL 16649
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 1992·No. No. 91-1115·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

STONE, Judge.

We affirm a summary judgment entered in favor of Winn Dixie. The appellant sued for an alleged violation of the section 559.72, Florida Statute (1981), Consumer Collection Practices Act, alleging that Winn Dixie’s collection practices violated the act. Winn Dixie had cashed a check, made payable to cash, that appellant previously gave to a salesman in a consumer transaction. The salesman was not connected to Winn Dixie other than through cashing the third party check.

Clearly, by its unambiguous terms, the Act applies only to the collection of consumer claims and requires an extension of credit. §§ 559.55(1), 559.72, Fla.Stat. (1981). Here, there was neither. Payment of cash in exchange for a check is not an extension of credit under the Act. See § 673.3-104(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1962).

DOWNEY and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Pierre v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 592 So. 2d 1252, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 775, 1992 WL 16649 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

592 So. 2d 1252 (St. Pierre v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morgan v. Wilkins
74 So. 3d 179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)