St. Pierre v. Mullen

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

St. Pierre v. Mullen

114 R.I. 958

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedMay 15, 1975

DocketM. P. No. 75-157

StatusPublished

This text of 114 R.I. 958 (St. Pierre v. Mullen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Pierre v. Mullen, 114 R.I. 958 (R.I. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Respondent is directed to file his answer to the petition for habeas corpus and therein to show cause, if any he has, why the writ should not issue as prayed, said answer [959]*959to be made in compliance with the provisions of Rule 14. The motion of petitioner to engage in oral argument is denied without prejudice to his right to raise this motion at a later date.

William F. Reilly, Public Defender, Peter DiBiase, Asst. Public Defender, for petitioner. Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respondent is directed to file his answer to the petition for habeas corpus and therein to show cause, if any he has, why the writ should not issue as prayed, said answer [959]*959to be made in compliance with the provisions of Rule 14. The motion of petitioner to engage in oral argument is denied without prejudice to his right to raise this motion at a later date.

William F. Reilly, Public Defender, Peter DiBiase, Asst. Public Defender, for petitioner. Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, for respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 R.I. 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-pierre-v-mullen-ri-1975.