St. Peter v. Nicholson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

St. Peter v. Nicholson

706 So. 2d 954, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2698, 1998 WL 115790

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 18, 1998

DocketNo. 97-3889

StatusPublished

This text of 706 So. 2d 954 (St. Peter v. Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Peter v. Nicholson, 706 So. 2d 954, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2698, 1998 WL 115790 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellant’s response to this court’s order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed, the appeal from the December 18, 1996, order denying appellant’s motion to set aside the final judgment rendered in case no. 95-822-CA-01 below is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130( b). The appeal shall continue as to all other orders being appealed.

BARFIELD, C.J., and WOLF, J., concur. JOANOS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellant’s response to this court’s order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed, the appeal from the December 18, 1996, order denying appellant’s motion to set aside the final judgment rendered in case no. 95-822-CA-01 below is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130( b). The appeal shall continue as to all other orders being appealed.

BARFIELD, C.J., and WOLF, J., concur. JOANOS, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

706 So. 2d 954, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2698, 1998 WL 115790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-peter-v-nicholson-fladistctapp-1998.