St. Pe v. Neal

534 So. 2d 993, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 2641, 1988 WL 130760
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided December 9, 1988·No. No. 88-C-2368·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PLOTKIN, Judge.

Writ denied.

Plaintiff Ralph St. Pe, Jr. brought two claims, the first a worker’s compensation claim growing out of a February 12, 1986 injury and the second a tort claim growing out of a July 17, 1986 automobile accident. The claims involve a common issue of injury. The same physician treated the plaintiff following both injuries. The injuries received in the automobile accident allegedly either overlapped or aggravated the prior injuries.

' Louisiana favors consolidation of a single litigant’s multiple personal injury claims. La.C.C.P. art. 1561, Mundy v. Gentilly Oaks, 228 La. 509, 82 So.2d 849 (1955), Ardoyno v. Ungar, 352 So.2d 320 (La.App. [994]*9944th Cir.1977). This prevents injustice by allowing the causation and damage issues to be adjudicated before a single judge, achieves judicial economy and results in the reduction of transactional costs.

Accordingly, we find no abuse of discretion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Pe v. Neal, 534 So. 2d 993, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 2641, 1988 WL 130760 (La. Ct. App. 1988).

534 So. 2d 993 (St. Pe v. Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. Lindsey
693 So. 2d 238 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1997)
Davis v. American Home Products Corp.
654 So. 2d 681 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1995)