St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Patten
This text of 182 So. 2d 842 (St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Patten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a companion suit of Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller, et al. v. LeBlanc, No. 6536 on the docket of this court, reported in 182 So.2d 835. The issue of law in this case and the above cited companion case is identical. The reasons for judgment assigned in the companion case are controlling of the issue in this case.
Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Cost of these proceedings to be paid by defendant, judgment debtor, David I.Patten.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 So. 2d 842, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 5497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-paul-mercury-indemnity-co-v-patten-lactapp-1966.