St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Patten

182 So. 2d 842, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 5497
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 24, 1966
DocketNo. 6544
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 182 So. 2d 842 (St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Patten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Patten, 182 So. 2d 842, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 5497 (La. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

BAILES, Judge.

This is a companion suit of Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller, et al. v. LeBlanc, No. 6536 on the docket of this court, reported in 182 So.2d 835. The issue of law in this case and the above cited companion case is identical. The reasons for judgment assigned in the companion case are controlling of the issue in this case.

Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Cost of these proceedings to be paid by defendant, judgment debtor, David I.Patten.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Patten
185 So. 2d 531 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1966)
Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller v. LeBlanc
182 So. 2d 835 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 So. 2d 842, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 5497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-paul-mercury-indemnity-co-v-patten-lactapp-1966.