St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Patten

Louisiana Court of Appeal

St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Patten

182 So. 2d 842, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 5497

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided January 24, 1966·No. No. 6544·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BAILES, Judge.

This is a companion suit of Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller, et al. v. LeBlanc, No. 6536 on the docket of this court, reported in 182 So.2d 835. The issue of law in this case and the above cited companion case is identical. The reasons for judgment assigned in the companion case are controlling of the issue in this case.

Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Cost of these proceedings to be paid by defendant, judgment debtor, David I.Patten.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BAILES, Judge.

This is a companion suit of Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller, et al. v. LeBlanc, No. 6536 on the docket of this court, reported in 182 So.2d 835. The issue of law in this case and the above cited companion case is identical. The reasons for judgment assigned in the companion case are controlling of the issue in this case.

Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Cost of these proceedings to be paid by defendant, judgment debtor, David I.Patten.

Reversed and remanded.

St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Patten, 182 So. 2d 842, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 5497 (La. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

182 So. 2d 842 (St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Patten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related