St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co. v. Wenzel
139 U.S. 23, 11 S. Ct. 396, 35 L. Ed. 73, 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2125
This text of 139 U.S. 23 (St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co. v. Wenzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co. v. Wenzel, 139 U.S. 23, 11 S. Ct. 396, 35 L. Ed. 73, 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2125 (1891).
Opinion
11 S.Ct. 396
35 L.Ed. 73
ST. PAUL, M. & M. RY. CO.
v.
WENZEL.
March 2, 1891.
S. U. Pinney, for appellant.
S. J. R. McMillan, for appellee.
FIELD, J.
This case involves the same question decided in Railway Co. v. Greenalgh, ante, 395, and upon the authority of that case the decree will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Tennessee Manufacturing Co.
138 U.S. 537 (Supreme Court, 1891)
Covington Stock-Yards Co. v. Keith
139 U.S. 128 (Supreme Court, 1891)
St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. Wenzel
139 U.S. 23 (Supreme Court, 1891)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
139 U.S. 23, 11 S. Ct. 396, 35 L. Ed. 73, 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-paul-m-m-ry-co-v-wenzel-scotus-1891.