St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co. v. Minnesota
This text of 214 U.S. 497 (St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co. v. Minnesota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
STATE OF MINNESOTA ex rel. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS.
Supreme Court of United States.
*498 Mr. Rome G. Brown, with whom Mr. Charles S. Albert and Mr. William R. Begg were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Frank Healy, with whom Mr. Albert E. Clarke was on the brief, for defendant in error.
Per Curiam:
Judgment affirmed on authority of Northern Pacific Railway Company v. State of Minnesota ex rel. Duluth, 208 U.S. 583.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 U.S. 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-paul-m-m-ry-co-v-minnesota-scotus-1909.