St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co. v. Minnesota
214 U.S. 497
Opinion
ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
STATE OF MINNESOTA ex rel. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS.
Supreme Court of United States.
*498 Mr. Rome G. Brown, with whom Mr. Charles S. Albert and Mr. William R. Begg were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Frank Healy, with whom Mr. Albert E. Clarke was on the brief, for defendant in error.
Per Curiam:
Judgment affirmed on authority of Northern Pacific Railway Company v. State of Minnesota ex rel. Duluth, 208 U.S. 583.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co. v. Minnesota, 214 U.S. 497 (1909).
214 U.S. 497 (St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co. v. Minnesota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Central Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
172 A. 357 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1934)
City of Birmingham v. Louisville N. R. Co.
112 So. 742 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. Great Northern Railway Co.
161 N.W. 506 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1917)
State ex rel. Ise v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
147 P. 801 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1915)