St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Standard Oil Co.

210 N.W. 80, 168 Minn. 353, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1571

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided July 30, 1926·No. No. 25,510.·Published

Opinion

*354 Pee Curiam.

This case involves the same fire and substantially the same questions involved in Getz against the same defendants decided herewith. (See page 347, supra.) The two cases were argued and submitted together and the decision in that case is decisive of this. While some of the minor questions differ somewhat from those in the other case, we find none which could change the result or which require special mention.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*354 Pee Curiam.

This case involves the same fire and substantially the same questions involved in Getz against the same defendants decided herewith. (See page 347, supra.) The two cases were argued and submitted together and the decision in that case is decisive of this. While some of the minor questions differ somewhat from those in the other case, we find none which could change the result or which require special mention.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Standard Oil Co., 210 N.W. 80, 168 Minn. 353, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1571 (Mich. 1926).

Pincite

210 N.W. 80 (St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Standard Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.