Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Sensus Technologies, Inc.

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Sensus Technologies, Inc.

297 A.D.2d 670, 747 N.Y.2d 185, 747 N.Y.S.2d 185, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8427
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 16, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 297 A.D.2d 670 (St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Sensus Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Sensus Technologies, Inc., 297 A.D.2d 670, 747 N.Y.2d 185, 747 N.Y.S.2d 185, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8427 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

The defendant failed to meet its burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; Camacho v East Ramapo Cent. School Dist., 262 AD2d 263).

[671]*671The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Camacho v. East Ramapo Central School District
262 A.D.2d 263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 670, 747 N.Y.2d 185, 747 N.Y.S.2d 185, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-paul-fire-marine-insurance-v-sensus-technologies-inc-nyappdiv-2002.