St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Satterfield

District Court of Appeal of Florida

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Satterfield

330 So. 2d 501

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 1976·No. Nos. 75-1119, 75-1511·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record on appeal and after due consideration of the briefs and oral argument we are of the opinion that genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to the adequacy of the notice given by defendant to plaintiff so as to preclude summary disposition. Accordingly, the final summary judgment is reversed and the order denying defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is vacated and set aside and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

WALDEN, C. J., MAGER, J., and RUD-NICK, VAUGHN, J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record on appeal and after due consideration of the briefs and oral argument we are of the opinion that genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to the adequacy of the notice given by defendant to plaintiff so as to preclude summary disposition. Accordingly, the final summary judgment is reversed and the order denying defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is vacated and set aside and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

WALDEN, C. J., MAGER, J., and RUD-NICK, VAUGHN, J., Associate Judge, concur.

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Satterfield, 330 So. 2d 501 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

330 So. 2d 501 (St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Satterfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related