St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Satterfield

330 So. 2d 501
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 9, 1976
DocketNos. 75-1119, 75-1511
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 330 So. 2d 501 (St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Satterfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Satterfield, 330 So. 2d 501 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record on appeal and after due consideration of the briefs and oral argument we are of the opinion that genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to the adequacy of the notice given by defendant to plaintiff so as to preclude summary disposition. Accordingly, the final summary judgment is reversed and the order denying defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is vacated and set aside and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

WALDEN, C. J., MAGER, J., and RUD-NICK, VAUGHN, J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City Nat. Bank v. SOMERSET DEVELOP.
330 So. 2d 501 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
330 So. 2d 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-paul-fire-marine-insurance-v-satterfield-fladistctapp-1976.