St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Murray Guard, Inc.

9 S.W.3d 501, 340 Ark. 307, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 44
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Murray Guard, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 343 Ark. 351
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 3, 2000·No. 99-515·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In response to appellant’s motion to lift the stay in the above-styled case, now docketed in the court of appeals, and to consolidate with NationsBank v. Murray Guard, case no. 99-891, filed with this court, we deny the motion without prejudice. We recognize that the similarity of the two cases, each arising from substantially the same set of facts, presents a potential for inconsistent decisions, and for that reason, we are reassigning case no. 99-515 to this court, without consolidating the two cases at this time.

Motion denied.

GLAZE, and Imber, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Murray Guard, Inc., 9 S.W.3d 501, 340 Ark. 307, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 44 (Ark. 2000).

9 S.W.3d 501 (St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Murray Guard, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.